<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to patches</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/android4maven/patches/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/android4maven/patches/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/android4maven/patches/</id><updated>2011-03-05T15:51:46Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to patches</subtitle><entry><title>scripts for building and checking ddmlib JARs</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/android4maven/patches/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2011-03-05T15:51:46Z</published><updated>2011-03-05T15:51:46Z</updated><author><name>Ladislav Thon</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/ladicek/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net2ce0bcb916a67c9a6fe18d28ca897b1c8b8f4013</id><summary type="html">Hello,

about a month ago I wrote to the Maven Android Developers mailing list about packaging ddmlib \(and possibly sdklib\) for Maven central. Today, I finally overcame my hate to AOSP's versioning scheme and finished a set of scripts that assemble ddmlib artifacts and check them against currently installed SDK tools.

The last version of SDK Tools is r10, which I also have installed, so I went ahead and packaged just that. \(It isn't possible to get older releases of SDK Tools, so while my ddmlib-assemble.sh script could build r9 artifacts, I couldn't check them with ddmlib-comparse.sh script.\)

I'm attaching a patch that adds a tools/ directory and three files inside it. It's probably clear from names, but short description follows:
\- ddmlib-pom.xml -- template from which the real pom.xml is built
\- ddmlib-assemble.sh -- assembles ddmlib source code to proper directory structure and builds it with Maven
\- ddmlib-compare.sh -- creates a diff of original ddmlib.jar \(from installed SDK\) and the newly built one

For me, the diff is almost empty \(only META-INF directory differs\), which means \(I suppose\) that the artifacts are OK.

Hope that git-formated patch is OK. Can try it other way if you need, though.

All input is welcome.</summary></entry></feed>