<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 45: Win32 TestRunner</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/cppunit/feature-requests/45/</link><description>Recent changes to 45: Win32 TestRunner</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/cppunit/feature-requests/45/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:43:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/cppunit/feature-requests/45/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Win32 TestRunner</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/cppunit/feature-requests/45/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm looking for a raw Win32 TestRunner with at least&lt;br /&gt;
the minimal functionality. The reasons are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) I'm currently working on 2 projects, both of which&lt;br /&gt;
use Bakefile to automate their build process. The&lt;br /&gt;
problem is that Bakefile can't produce an MFC application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) I've worked on one project which had it's own custom&lt;br /&gt;
C++ heap. This heap was incompatible with MFC's heap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both of these would be fixed by removing the dependency&lt;br /&gt;
on MFC. I've fallen back on using the console&lt;br /&gt;
testrunner for now, but a big selling point of this for&lt;br /&gt;
my bosses is the friendly GUI.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Malcolm Nixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:43:32 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netfc21349ef3dca9097ff4ee87e8f283b18564444f</guid></item></channel></rss>