<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/</id><updated>2012-09-17T09:11:58Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>Publishing Client Compatible with ArcGIS 10.1</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/39/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-09-17T09:11:58Z</published><updated>2012-09-17T09:11:58Z</updated><author><name>Rob Ward</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/robward96/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net4e54534431291155185b7baa136284881ecf4813</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently Publishing Client 1.2 is not compatible with ArcGIS 10.1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Publishing Client Compatible with ArcGIS 10.1</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/39/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-09-17T09:11:58Z</published><updated>2012-09-17T09:11:58Z</updated><author><name>Rob Ward</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/robward96/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net4bc4949eeabe5ffb33b733b1945e10d6bbe910b1</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ticket 39 has been modified: Publishing Client Compatible with ArcGIS 10.1&lt;br/&gt;
Edited By: Marten Hogeweg (mhogeweg)&lt;br/&gt;
Status updated: 'open' =&amp;gt; 'closed'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Add REST API as federated search option</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/37/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-05-24T15:31:00Z</published><updated>2012-05-24T15:31:00Z</updated><author><name>David Neufeld</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/dneufeld/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netb9623fe8f7699679ba8932047b97200556c12bc4</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider adding the Geoportal REST API as a federated search option.  This would allow more detailed and consistent search results across federated searches that share common property meaning and indexing strategies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use Case:&lt;br /&gt;
NGDC has a wms.resource.url that we can search on that will return all WMS services that are documented using ISO service elements.  This returns more results that a simple text search for WMS.  However federating a wms.resource.url search to other NOAA data centers will fail using CSW because the resource is not part of the core queryables.  It's possible that I'm missing something on the CSW limitation here, but if not then adding the REST API as a federated search option would be valuable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for considering.&lt;br /&gt;
-Dave&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Add REST API as federated search option</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/37/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-05-24T15:31:00Z</published><updated>2012-05-24T15:31:00Z</updated><author><name>David Neufeld</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/dneufeld/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netda9e6ff4ef0f55fcccae6fcbe6040f84c39e1190</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ticket 37 has been modified: Add REST API as federated search option&lt;br/&gt;
Edited By: Marten Hogeweg (mhogeweg)&lt;br/&gt;
Status updated: 'open' =&amp;gt; 'closed'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Add Flikr Federated search</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/36/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-03-21T13:10:00Z</published><updated>2012-03-21T13:10:00Z</updated><author><name>Jacqueline Mize</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/jmize/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netc1fc3eb837f4bc07780873b513d5211e3def0dab</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would like to see a Flikr search similar to the youtube seach ability. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Add Flikr Federated search</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/36/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-03-21T13:10:00Z</published><updated>2012-03-21T13:10:00Z</updated><author><name>Jacqueline Mize</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/jmize/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netd8d1a043a06eb2ae1f0a7d1d06f8722f7ab71469</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ticket 36 has been modified: Add Flikr Federated search&lt;br/&gt;
Edited By: Marten Hogeweg (mhogeweg)&lt;br/&gt;
Status updated: 'open' =&amp;gt; 'closed'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Details for federated metadata</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/35/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-03-20T09:15:14Z</published><updated>2012-03-20T09:15:14Z</updated><author><name>Gianni Campanile</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/gcampanile/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netc5289b12a77f2f7b7be8f5db63acc952aecd5db7</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The details link is available only for "internal" records and not for federated catalogues. These records should be validated to match a defined style, but it's extremely useful to show the details page even if some mandatory values are not available. Thus, the details link should appear in any case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Details for federated metadata</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/35/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-03-20T09:15:14Z</published><updated>2012-03-20T09:15:14Z</updated><author><name>Gianni Campanile</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/gcampanile/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net7a3c288b3d935a5b2885de5dd2908dd8b80c844a</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ticket 35 has been modified: Details for federated metadata&lt;br/&gt;
Edited By: Marten Hogeweg (mhogeweg)&lt;br/&gt;
Status updated: 'open' =&amp;gt; 'closed'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Validate "against" a profile</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/34/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-03-20T09:11:15Z</published><updated>2012-03-20T09:11:15Z</updated><author><name>Gianni Campanile</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/gcampanile/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netb7ca8529cb2c10748baf350abdee099bf1d9f5c1</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The interrogation mechanism of the Geoportal implies that when verifying a metadata record, the profile is determined by some values in the metdata record. Unfortunately there is no way to determine exactly the profile, so if the record, for example an ISO profile record, is recognized as an INSPIRE one, many validation errors are shown, because INSPIRE is much more restrictive than ISO. This is the reason why ISO and INSPIRE schemas should not be both activated in the schemas.xml, but inmany cases both schemas are needed. A solution could be to choose the schema agints which an external XML file could be validated. The default could be in any case the interrogation mode, identifying the record from the tag values.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Validate "against" a profile</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/geoportal/feature-requests/34/" rel="alternate"/><published>2012-03-20T09:11:15Z</published><updated>2012-03-20T09:11:15Z</updated><author><name>Gianni Campanile</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/gcampanile/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net2f2a3ef41151d86630ca3c6ed822cfce20890451</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ticket 34 has been modified: Validate "against" a profile&lt;br/&gt;
Edited By: Marten Hogeweg (mhogeweg)&lt;br/&gt;
Status updated: 'open' =&amp;gt; 'closed'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>