<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Activity for jpathwatch</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/activity/</link><description>Recent activity for jpathwatch</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 12:33:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>mike payne posted a comment on discussion jpathwatch Forum</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/8194363416/?limit=25#9ac3</link><description>Hello All. I desperately need help. I moved a perfectly working project from an old Win 10 laptop (Pro) to a new Win 10 laptop (Home). It's code is simple enough, it registers a path watcher on a directory (nothing special, something like c:\folder, to which I have opened all permissions). See the following code: Path path = Paths.get(dirDTO.getPath()); path.register(watcher, new WatchEvent.Kind&lt;?&gt;[]{ ExtendedWatchEventKind.ENTRY_RENAME_FROM, ExtendedWatchEventKind.ENTRY_RENAME_TO, StandardWatchEventKind.ENTRY_CREATE,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mike payne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 12:33:12 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/8194363416/?limit=25#9ac3</guid></item><item><title>Justin Dolezy posted a comment on ticket #6</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-issues/6/?limit=25#89a2</link><description>This and issue #5 are the same thing - the iterator is fail-fast and in both implementations when the underlying collection being iterated changes via the call the cancelImpl() on FileNotFound you get the ConcurrentModificationException (granted it's a rubbish name when in a single thread!) Simplest one liner change is to make the 'keys' HashMap a ConcurrentHashMap. Alterntively remove the 'keys.remove()' from cancelImpl() and make it the callers responsibility.. (uff!) Our junit test is built upon...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Dolezy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:26:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-issues/6/?limit=25#89a2</guid></item><item><title>Justin Dolezy posted a comment on discussion jpathwatch Forum</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/fe207b7b/?limit=25#f0b0</link><description>We've been testing and it turns out that it does indeed work with APFS. Out of the box though we encountered a problem which turns out to be the ConcurrentModificaitonException is issue 6. It's very easy to fix, I'll comment over there..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Dolezy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:54:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/fe207b7b/?limit=25#f0b0</guid></item><item><title>Justin Dolezy modified a comment on discussion jpathwatch Forum</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/fe207b7b/?limit=25#10e4</link><description>Hi, Has anyone used jpatchwatch on APFS, introduced in High Sierra? Our testing idicated BarbaryWatchService doesn't behave as expected, so we'll need to try jpathwatch but perhaps someone has tried this already? Thanks, Justin</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Dolezy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:51:22 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/fe207b7b/?limit=25#10e4</guid></item><item><title>Justin Dolezy posted a comment on discussion jpathwatch Forum</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/fe207b7b/?limit=25#10e4</link><description>Hi, Has anyone used jpatchwatch on APFS, introduced in High Sierra? Our testing idicated BarbaryWatchService doesn't behave as expecte, so we'll need to try jpathwatch but perhaps someone has tried this already? Thanks, Justin</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Dolezy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:56:13 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/discussion/888207/thread/fe207b7b/?limit=25#10e4</guid></item><item><title>Uwe Pachler posted a comment on ticket #6</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-issues/6/?limit=50#b3ea/940c</link><description>As you can see there's not much going on with jpathwatch any more. As expected, JDK7...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Uwe Pachler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 05:46:46 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-issues/6/?limit=50#b3ea/940c</guid></item><item><title>&lt;REDACTED&gt; posted a comment on ticket #6</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-issues/6/?limit=50#b3ea</link><description>Don't suppose this will be fixed? I run into the same problem on OSX and monitoring...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">&lt;REDACTED&gt;</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 22:04:12 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/jpathwatch/jpathwatch-issues/6/?limit=50#b3ea</guid></item></channel></rss>