https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-igd/feature-requests/2012-07-07T12:05:53ZRecent changes to feature-requests2012-07-07T12:05:53Z2012-07-07T12:05:53ZNick Levertonhttps://sourceforge.net/u/leveret/https://sourceforge.net354b0fc0ca6280eb0af9d5605803ab7a77596f74

<div class="markdown_content"><p>Forwarded on behalf of a Debian user (</p> <p>Normally, linux-igd works justs fine for hosts other than my router. A service on the localhost tried to forward a<br /> port to itself. It detected its internal IP address just fine and asked linux-igd to set up a forwarding. linux-igd<br /> did that, but it put the rule into the FORWARD chain, where the packets never get. Since the DNAT rule sends the<br /> packets to the internal IP on the localhost, they get to the INPUT chain.</p> <p>So I would like to request the following feature: when a forwarding is requested for a local IP address, the ACCEPT<br /> rule should be created in the INPUT chain, not the forward chain. The DNAT rule in the PREROUTING chain should<br /> behave the same way as it does now.</p></div>

2010-03-01T07:19:57Z2010-03-01T07:19:57ZAnonymoushttps://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/https://sourceforge.net8de254f8182b64fd446ed255de0703b0fd3a30cb

<div class="markdown_content"><p>NAT Port Mapping Protocol<br /> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAT_Port_Mapping_Protocol" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAT_Port_Mapping_Protocol</a></p></div>

2008-02-19T11:07:23Z2008-02-19T11:07:23ZAndCyclehttps://sourceforge.net/u/andcycle/https://sourceforge.net180b8c653af45e4de97c10069149ab11d4326491

<div class="markdown_content"><p>I wanna to limit upnp port range to avoid setting conflict with firewall, a wish to have feature :X</p></div>

2007-09-24T08:18:40Z2007-09-24T08:18:40Zb-s-ahttps://sourceforge.net/u/b-s-a/https://sourceforge.nete4666be13c7cc816e691c3b597b0e21310c606be

<div class="markdown_content"><p>For example my router has an external Ethernet interface to my provider's private network with (using DirectConnect to exchange files) and PPTP tunnel (through Ethernet) to the Internet.<br /> It is good idea to add/delete port mappings for all external interfaces by one request from user application.</p></div>

2006-11-21T13:31:12Z2006-11-21T13:31:12ZNileshkumar S Dainehttps://sourceforge.net/u/nileshkumard/https://sourceforge.net72680c0113d19b931f46181e67e9b1b19f49bbf6

<div class="markdown_content"><p>If WAN IP status or WAN IP address is changed on gateway device, all control points who has subscribed to services should notified (NOTIFY) with property change of state variable like ConnectionStatus and ExternalIPAddress respectively.</p> <p>Possible options are to start an indepdent thread and check the status or ip change of WAN and Notify Control points with allready available GENA APIs.</p> <p>This can be kind of Timer thread running every second or so.</p></div>

2006-09-08T11:18:17Z2006-09-08T11:18:17ZJay OConnorhttps://sourceforge.net/u/jdoconnor/https://sourceforge.net069c938bf73849f617d965e0fad7c1790a6a1292

<div class="markdown_content"><p>It would be useful to have a upnp message to forward<br /> certain ports act on the current idg, then check to see<br /> if the current idg is part of another NAT network, and<br /> open the same ports upstream.</p></div>

2004-02-09T21:29:39Z2004-02-09T21:29:39ZNorman Rasmussenhttps://sourceforge.net/u/normanr/https://sourceforge.net7579426ebf67f9787e528aefac57ee748aeaafd9

<div class="markdown_content"><p>How about a Debian package next ? I've never tried to <br /> get stuff into the Debian developers tree, but I'm sure <br /> it's not too hard.</p></div>