<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 118: quality of keywords </title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/</id><updated>2007-09-11T13:53:15Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 118: quality of keywords </subtitle><entry><title>quality of keywords </title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-09-11T13:53:15Z</published><updated>2007-09-11T13:53:15Z</updated><author><name>DianeE_OU</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-1815396/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netdb44950f9927538b5abef3b52865a22efa5167c1</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have just been checking the results of KWE against the metadata already assigned for the LOs I had hoped to use for the KWE trial. This is an example for one of the LOs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The keywords bear no ressemblance to those before.&lt;br /&gt;
Plus the results this week are not as good as before the latest changes at the end of last week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>