<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 118: quality of keywords </title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/</link><description>Recent changes to 118: quality of keywords </description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:53:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>quality of keywords </title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/118/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have just been checking the results of KWE against the metadata already assigned for the LOs I had hoped to use for the KWE trial. This is an example for one of the LOs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The keywords bear no ressemblance to those before.&lt;br /&gt;
Plus the results this week are not as good as before the latest changes at the end of last week.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DianeE_OU</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:53:15 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netdb44950f9927538b5abef3b52865a22efa5167c1</guid></item></channel></rss>