<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 184: inconsitency between ontology hierarchy and alphabetic</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/184/</link><description>Recent changes to 184: inconsitency between ontology hierarchy and alphabetic</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/184/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:02:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/184/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>inconsitency between ontology hierarchy and alphabetic</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/lt4el/feedback-tracker/184/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I noticed today that if I search for "Dublin Core" in the ontology browser, it cannot file any concept; but if I go to the alphabetic list the concept appears there. Furthermore the concept appears only if the main language  in English, but if the main language is Portuguese I cannot locate "dublin core".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally, almost the same happens with "ftp", if I search for ftp in the ontology browser in English I got the concept in the hierarchy, but if the language is Portuguese, no concept is highlight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RosaGaudio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:02:41 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net8ae7795d6c4fdce027e87d040ee4ce27b70f3f4e</guid></item></channel></rss>