https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/activity/Recent activity for The Netwide AssemblerenTue, 06 Apr 2021 16:00:57 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/563/Infinite loop / null pointer accessJason LiangTue, 06 Apr 2021 16:00:57 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/563/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/feature-requests/198/New(?) opcodesIouri KharonSat, 07 Jul 2018 08:56:02 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/feature-requests/198/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#9068no problem, i come back checking updates just now. no delay to me, thanks for help,wild pieTue, 24 Apr 2018 07:07:12 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#9068https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#4c4c/c3fbHi Cyrill, I got the email registeration confirmation and just forwarded the reports to bugzilla. Thanks for your response.Trace ProbeMon, 23 Apr 2018 19:57:43 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#4c4c/c3fbhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#4c4cThanks for report. Once you manage to register on bugzilla copy it there please.Cyrill GorcunovMon, 23 Apr 2018 19:29:18 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#4c4chttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#e2c0Reporting the bug here since i am not able to create an account on Bugzilla Could you please try again. Hopefully I've fixed mailing issue on https://bugzilla.nasm.us/ if it won't pass please ping me directly to gorcunov@gmail.comCyrill GorcunovMon, 23 Apr 2018 19:28:35 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#e2c0https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#f1d6The same POC file causes a "memory alignment error" for stable version nasm 2.13. 273 static uint8_t *do_ea(uint8_t *data, int modrm, int asize, 274 int segsize, enum ea_type type, 275 operand *op, insn *ins) ... 449 switch (mod) { 462 case 2: 463 op->segment |= SEG_DISP32; **464 op->offset = gets32(data);** 465 data += 4; 466 break; 467 } 468 return data; 469 } 470 } The error log is attached: disasm/disasm.c:464:26: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x7ffc53ca36a3 for type 'uint32_t', which...Trace ProbeMon, 23 Apr 2018 18:09:53 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/?limit=25#f1d6https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=25#ff4dWe have moved to new hosting so there might be problem with emals and such because not eveything gone smooth yet, hopefully I manage to fix all the problems during the upcoming week.Cyrill GorcunovSun, 22 Apr 2018 21:20:23 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=25#ff4dhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=25#600fI'm very sorry for delay in reply, we happen to not use SF service novaday. I've activated your account on the forum, please try to login there and copy messages to.Cyrill GorcunovSun, 22 Apr 2018 21:18:38 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=25#600fhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/Stack-Buffer-Overflow in disasm (src/disasm/disasm.c)Trace ProbeSat, 21 Apr 2018 19:39:14 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/562/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/561/Stack buffer overflow (out-of-bound) in disasm (src/disasm/disasm.c)Trace ProbeSat, 21 Apr 2018 14:42:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/561/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#c487i'm using nasm 2.11.08wild pieSun, 08 Apr 2018 22:36:33 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#c487https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#dea8also, i'd appreciate if you can activate my account (wild.pie) on nasm.us, in case i have other questions. thank you,wild pieSun, 08 Apr 2018 22:26:27 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#dea8https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#9d4awell, i have existing code to manipulate 64-bit seg descriptors, but i don't have 32-bit protected mode code. the problem is cpu enforces flat memory in long mode. don't want to spend too much time on this, so i posted on stackoverflow and here's a response agreeing with my suspects: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49721801/does-ebp2-reference-ds-or-ss-segment does this make sense? if i'm wrong, can you tell me why [ebp*2] is the same as [ebp+ebp}? thanks,wild pieSun, 08 Apr 2018 22:23:43 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#9d4ahttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#3976but why [ebp+edx] and [edx+ebp] are different? it takes some time to test this in a 32-bit or 64-bit mode, but doable. is there an easier way to verify this?wild pieSun, 08 Apr 2018 06:55:25 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#3976https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=25#1872This forum is generally considered abandoned. I've only very recently started coding again, but if you are still unable to register at nasm.us, I will try to help. As far as I recall, [ebp*2] is the same as [ebp + ebp*1]Debbie WilesSun, 08 Apr 2018 02:20:07 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=25#1872https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#7433is this forum abandoned? tried to sign up on nasm.us forum, but cannot receive activation email. i had no problem signup here with same email. also, nasm generates [ebp, eiz] for [eiz, ebp] (optimization for shorter machine code, which i think is incorrect), but it generates different codes for [ebp, edx] and [edx, ebp], which is correct.wild pieSat, 07 Apr 2018 23:58:11 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#7433https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#2458nasm generates optimized code for [eax*2]. it generates the code as [eax + eax] instead. i just noticed it also replaces [ebp*2] with [ebp + ebp]. in [ebp*2], ebp is the index register, not base register. so this form references DS segment. in [ebp + ebp], ebp is used as base register, so it references SS segment. is this a nasm bug or i missed something? IDM vol 1 page 3-21 "Table 3-5 Default Segment Selection Rules", memory reference uses SS by default if EBP is used as base register Any memory...wild pieFri, 06 Apr 2018 06:44:00 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#2458https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#2458nasm generates optimized code for [eax*2]. it generates the code as [eax + eax] instead. i just noticed it also replaces [ebp*2] with [ebp + ebp]. in [ebp*2], ebp is the index register, not base register. so this form references DS segment. in [ebp + ebp], ebp is used as base register, so it references SS segment. is this a nasm bug or i missed something? IDM vol 1 page 3-21 "Table 3-5 Default Segment Selection Rules", memory reference uses SS by default if EBP is used as base register Any memory...wild pieFri, 06 Apr 2018 06:42:34 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#2458https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#2458nasm generates optimized code for [eax*2]. it generates the code as [eax + eax] instead. i just noticed it also replaces [ebp*2] with [ebp + ebp]. in [ebp*2], ebp is the index register, not base register. so this form references DS segment. in [ebp + ebp], ebp is used as base register, so it references SS segment. is this a nasm bug or i missed something? IDM vol 1 page 3-21 "Table 3-5 Default Segment Selection Rules", memory reference uses SS by default Any memory reference which uses the ESP or...wild pieFri, 06 Apr 2018 06:40:44 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/18e79c06/?limit=100#2458https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167171/thread/9b766b42/?limit=25#2878Hi, I have just dowloaded and installed the tool from the offical web site. Surprisingly, an application called Elara, and considered as a malware, has appeared on my computer. I'm currenlty trying to remove it.Alain KaufmannWed, 26 Jul 2017 14:37:13 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167171/thread/9b766b42/?limit=25#2878https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/521/?limit=25#e83bEDIT: I shouldn't have listed 'mylabel dd 0' as a definition. I know that, and this is what I'd expect, mylabel will be translated to the address/offset, not to the value of the memory it precedes.AnonymousSun, 18 Jun 2017 09:50:43 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/521/?limit=25#e83bhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/feature-requests/197/Ability to enable deprecated/experimental features via command line flagsOleh LukyrychTue, 28 Jun 2016 15:18:23 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/feature-requests/197/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/560/ndisasm truncates 64 bit origin specified in command lineRuslan KabatsayevSun, 16 Aug 2015 15:20:24 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/560/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/patches/4/Minor fixes for typosJonas QuinnTue, 12 May 2015 21:19:54 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/patches/4/https://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-2.00rc1-os2.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-2.00rc1-os2.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nsm09833.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nsm09833.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.99.05-os2.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.99.05-os2.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.98.30-20020429.tar.bz2/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.98.30-20020429.tar.bz2/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.99.06-os2.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.99.06-os2.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-2.00-os2.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-2.00-os2.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-2.02rc2-dos.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-2.02rc2-dos.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nsm09834.zip/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nsm09834.zip/downloadhttps://sourceforge.nethttp%3A//sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.98.24-2-cygwin.tar.bz2/downloadThe Netwide AssemblerTue, 16 Dec 2014 16:37:40 -0000http://sourceforge.net/projects/nasm/files/OldFiles/nasm-0.98.24-2-cygwin.tar.bz2/downloadhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/559/AVX512 instructions with {sae} but no rounding control should specify vector size in LL bitsA FogFri, 05 Dec 2014 16:06:04 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/559/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/558/vpinsrb vpinsrw vpextrb vpextrw with EVEX and memory operand have wrong compressed displacementA FogWed, 03 Dec 2014 09:05:52 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/558/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/f6f6d6c5/?limit=25#5393/5afd/fd12Thanks a million Ivan. The CS: was the problem. I had tried FAR before but without...afkSun, 03 Aug 2014 03:37:51 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/f6f6d6c5/?limit=25#5393/5afd/fd12https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/f6f6d6c5/?limit=25#5393/5afdI believe you should make these changes in NewCode: call far [cs:OLDINTADRoff] Remember...Ivan NgeowSun, 03 Aug 2014 02:01:59 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/f6f6d6c5/?limit=25#5393/5afdhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/f6f6d6c5/?limit=25#5393The code below is an attempt to re-vector a BIOS interrupt (09h) If the program is...afkSun, 03 Aug 2014 01:20:42 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/discussion/167169/thread/f6f6d6c5/?limit=25#5393https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/539/?limit=25#5e4dyou can use following combination: mov rax, 0x123456789abcdef0 ; 64-bit constant...AndreyThu, 24 Jul 2014 12:34:18 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/539/?limit=25#5e4dhttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/557/?limit=25#09deI found the root cause. The ndisasm come with Xcode is too old, version is "NDISASM...PeterSun, 20 Apr 2014 18:01:03 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/557/?limit=25#09dehttps://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/557/ndisasm hangPeterSun, 20 Apr 2014 17:38:30 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/557/https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/556/error configuring NASM using MinGW/MSysMike MorganThu, 10 Apr 2014 14:09:44 -0000https://sourceforge.net/p/nasm/bugs/556/