<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ppcpp/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ppcpp/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:39:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/ppcpp/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Compile as Apache 2.0 filter module</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ppcpp/feature-requests/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real motivation for me to use ppC++ is that I want&lt;br /&gt;
my server code to run very, very fast without consuming&lt;br /&gt;
hoards of extra memory.  if speed were not an issue,&lt;br /&gt;
then I would use PHP.  If memory were not an issue, I&lt;br /&gt;
would use Java.  So, ppC++ would be kick ass for my&lt;br /&gt;
application if I could run it as a filter module.  The&lt;br /&gt;
module would compile pages to a new path, from which&lt;br /&gt;
the functions would be loaded as DSO's.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:39:24 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net547b7046d91147f7da98d2fc16b8b4137d4ee92d</guid></item></channel></rss>