<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/pyml/feature-requests/</link><description>Recent changes to feature-requests</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/pyml/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:44:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/pyml/feature-requests/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Multiclass ROC</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/pyml/feature-requests/3/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see PyML.evaluators.roc module, it just has 1 by 1 lable.&lt;br /&gt;
Please include one vs rest roc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anol Paisal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:44:12 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net73edf7aa25ee112ce46e61e5f0aa50b73bdc3fad</guid></item><item><title>Storage of trained kernel data</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/pyml/feature-requests/2/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I use your lib for very large datasets. The training&lt;br /&gt;
time is sometimes very long. Is it possible to enhance&lt;br /&gt;
the SVM class with a read/write method ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br /&gt;
Thilo Wehrmann&lt;br /&gt;
thilo.wehrmann@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:01:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net35b144cb8382602049fc89e66dad95e978485104</guid></item><item><title>matthews correlation coefficient (mcc) et al.</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/pyml/feature-requests/1/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;matthews correlation coefficient (mcc) is a valuable&lt;br /&gt;
tool for model selection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Especially if classes are very unevenly distributed you&lt;br /&gt;
can get acceptable values for ROC, ppv, balancedSuccess&lt;br /&gt;
etc. although the classifier assigns all examples to&lt;br /&gt;
the same class. mcc gives 0 in such cases. AFAIK the&lt;br /&gt;
extension to more than two classes ist straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
(i think the Baldi/Brunak book has a formula).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However pure mcc assigns 0 also to perfect classifiers,&lt;br /&gt;
so one needs probably a measure which is mcc derived. &lt;br /&gt;
The minimum and the standard deviation of the&lt;br /&gt;
performance measures obtained by stratifiedCV are also&lt;br /&gt;
important indicators and should be given together with&lt;br /&gt;
the average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In summary I would like to see a bit more flexibility&lt;br /&gt;
in how the best model is selected from e.g. a ParamGrid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ozi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:05:53 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.netccff9a1c398eb588e9617aa0d1bf492b9a22fff8</guid></item></channel></rss>