Activity for QTester104

QTester104 released /qtester104-v3.0.0-x64.zip

QTester104 — Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:34:02 -0000

QTester104 updated /readme.txt

QTester104 — Sat, 25 Apr 2026 21:34:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.7.2-x64.zip

QTester104 — Mon, 12 May 2025 12:01:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.7.1-x64.zip

QTester104 — Fri, 09 May 2025 14:00:02 -0000

QTester104 updated /readme.txt

QTester104 — Fri, 09 May 2025 14:00:02 -0000

ricardolo imported Code

ricardolo — Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:17:13 -0000

QTester104 updated /readme.txt

QTester104 — Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:07:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.6.2-x64.zip

QTester104 — Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:06:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104v2.4.1.zip

QTester104 — Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:13:02 -0000

QTester104 updated /readme.txt

QTester104 — Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:51:03 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.5-x64.zip

QTester104 — Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:51:03 -0000

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:01:28 -0000

Hi I tested it with Vincy Analyzer and it detected and returned the right addresses. It seems to be a problem with your slave side.

Stanislav posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Stanislav — Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:20:25 -0000

Maximum address is 65535. When I sent 65536 it hasn't feedback status. When I sent 65537 feedback address is 1!

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.4.zip

QTester104 — Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:56:03 -0000

QTester104 updated /readme.txt

QTester104 — Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:54:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.3.zip

QTester104 — Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:56:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.2.zip

QTester104 — Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:52:02 -0000

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:04:16 -0000

Hi Sebastian, The connection is being dropped by the server for some reason. "QAbstractSocket::RemoteHostClosedError 1 The remote host closed the connection. Note that the client socket (i.e., this socket) will be closed after the remote close notification has been sent." Source https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractsocket.html You should check the server for allowed client IP addresses, check also client and server link addresses on both sides. Check server logs for the motive, if possible. Best regards,...

Sebastian posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Sebastian — Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:46:56 -0000

Hi, i new in this area and im testing your IEC Tester. When try to start the connection i got the following error. What do socket error 1 mean? Exist an erro code list? Thx for the tool, keep going. 13:03:20 Di Sep 8 2020 - v2.1 !!!!!TRY TO CONNECT! Try to connect IP: 192.168.30.1 *** TCP CONNECT! T<-- 006: 68 04 07 00 00 00 STARTDTACT SocketError: 1 *** TCP DISCONNECT! 13:03:25 !!!!!TRY TO CONNECT! Try to connect IP: 192.168.30.1 *** TCP CONNECT! T<-- 006: 68 04 07 00 00 00 STARTDTACT SocketError:...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 27 May 2020 11:52:07 -0000

Hi Quang, Sorry there isn't a proper manual. Just this tiny readme file. But you can ask me any question, no problem. Best regards, Ricardo

Quang Linh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Quang Linh — Wed, 27 May 2020 09:54:53 -0000

Hi Mr. Ricardolo Please share manual of Qtester104 . I want to study this tool Thank you so much. On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 10:40 Quang Linh quanglinh@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Thank you so much Mr.Ricardolo I can cant controll. Wish you have an happy day! Have problem with double command https://sourceforge.net/p/qtester104/discussion/general/thread/81c039f3bd/?limit=25#c077 Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/qtester104/discussion/general/ To unsubscribe...

Quang Linh modified a comment on discussion General Discussion

Quang Linh — Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:46:06 -0000

Thank you so much Mr.Ricardolo I can controll. Wish you have an happy day!

Quang Linh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Quang Linh — Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:40:46 -0000

Thank you so much Mr.Ricardolo I can cant controll. Wish you have an happy day!

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Sat, 21 Mar 2020 23:11:42 -0000

Hi Quang, I have tested now version 2.1 and it worked (see below). For double command, use value 2 for ON and 1 for OFF. Check also the QU field (can be 0-3). Best regards, Ricardo 20:04:13 T<-- 006: 68 04 01 00 18 00 SUPERVISORY 18 20:04:15 T<-- 016: 68 0e 06 00 18 00 2e 01 06 03 04 00 89 13 00 8e DOUBLE COMMAND ADDRESS 5001 DCS 2 CA 4 QU 3 SE 1 R--> 016: 68 0e 18 00 08 00 2e 01 07 03 04 00 89 13 00 8e CA 4 TYPE 46 CAUSE 7 SQ 0 NUM 1 ACTIVATION CONFIRMATION POSITIVE DOUBLE COMMAND ADDRESS 5001 DCS...

Quang Linh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Quang Linh — Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:50:11 -0000

Dear Mr.Ricardolo I could use single command ( with SBO) but I couldnt control double command ( with SBO) with Qtester104. With other toos as test harness than I could use both success. Please help me to clear it. Reagard!

Ketil Johannessen modified a comment on discussion General Discussion

Ketil Johannessen — Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:53:51 -0000

Thanks! That did the trick; I am now able to both send commands as well as receive analog measurements in the OSHMI Screen Viewer. Thanks a lot for swift and good response on this.

Ketil Johannessen posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Ketil Johannessen — Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:53:16 -0000

Thanks! That did the trick; I am now able to both send commands as well as receive analog measurements in the OSHMI Screen Viewer. Thanks a lot for swift and goog response on this.

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Mon, 06 Jan 2020 02:34:20 -0000

Hi Ketil, Please check your point_list.txt file. For the command point, the RTU column must have the slave address (same value as SECONDARY_ADDRESS parameter from QTester104).

Ketil Johannessen posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Ketil Johannessen — Sun, 05 Jan 2020 23:13:28 -0000

Hi! I have downloaded the OSHMI bundle and setup. Then disabled simulation mode and configured one of the circuit breakers in the KAW screen to route via RTU1. When I try to trip the circuit breaker from ON-> OFF, I see a grey log line of this messsage received by the QTester104, but it does not relay this command to the RTU. I do however see the GI request going to the RTU . Is there some config I have missed out which disables/prohibits the qtester104 protocol driver from actually sending the command...

ricardolo modified a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:18:20 -0000

I have never seen a system or RTU that make use of these ASDUs for parameter setting/activation. I guess that the working of those commands will vary from system to system. I mean some system may activate the parameter immediately, others may activete it by the P_AC_NA_1 ASDU. If you eventually learn something from this, please share it here so we may learn also as the usage in practice of those commands is kind of obscure.

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:17:52 -0000

Pasi Lauri posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Pasi Lauri — Thu, 05 Dec 2019 20:56:37 -0000

Hi RicardoThis is very fine. I have not used these command earlier. Do you know, is the system, that firstly set all parameters with 110-113 commands and then put these on by 114 command? Thank PasiSent from my Huawei Mobile-------- Original Message --------Subject: [qtester104:discussion] Re: P_ME_NA_1 etcFrom: ricardolo ricardolo@users.sourceforge.netTo: "[qtester104:discussion] " general@discussion.qtester104.p.re.sourceforge.netCC: Hi Pasi, I have updated QTester104, version 2.1, with support...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:51:42 -0000

Hi Pasi, I have updated QTester104, version 2.1, with support for 110-113 ASDUs in control direction. Also now the software can register in the point map panel the return of commands from RTU. I am not aware of another free software that can generate those ASDUs. Maybe some trial version. I hope this update can be useful to you. Best regards, Ricardo

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.1.zip

QTester104 — Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:46:04 -0000

Pasi Lauri posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Pasi Lauri — Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:45:29 -0000

The newest Qtest has lot of ASDU types but Parameters in Control Directions (110..113) are missing. Does anyone know a free program can be generated these? PL

QTester104 released /qtester104-v2.0.zip

QTester104 — Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:13:02 -0000

Derek modified a comment on discussion General Discussion

Derek — Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:28:45 -0000

Screenshot of v1.24 and v1.25 - http://prntscr.com/n4fqth Hi Ricardo, Qtester104 v1.25 does not seem to show the GI results even though the packets are returned while v1.24 does. I've checked for the packets in Wireshark and they seem to be returned fine in both versions. I'm not sure if this is just an output display issue or a deeper issue. In any case, just letting you know! Thanks for your help on OSHMI and QTester104! EDIT: Selecting "Point Mapping" worked, my mistake! Thank you, Ricardo!

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Sat, 30 Mar 2019 13:45:40 -0000

In version 1.25 you have to select "Point Mapping" to collect point values in the right panel. This was turned into an option because it can affect performance for very large quantities of data.

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Sat, 30 Mar 2019 13:36:25 -0000

Derek, QTester104 version 1.25 process network packets much faster than previous versions, specially GI packets, maybe you haven't noticed them passing fast. The packects should be logged, try to unselect "Auto Scroll" option and look back in the log to see if packets are there, they are marked with cause 20.

Derek modified a comment on discussion General Discussion

Derek — Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:07:21 -0000

Derek posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Derek — Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:06:08 -0000

Hi Ricardo, Qtester104 v1.25 does not seem to show the GI results even though the packets are returned while v1.24 does. I've checked for the packets in Wireshark and they seem to be returned fine in both versions. I'm not sure if this is just an output display issue or a deeper issue. In any case, just letting you know! Thanks for your help on OSHMI and QTester104!

Nitish posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nitish — Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:13:46 -0000

Sir, Yes this simulator has both the reset process and test commands. Thanks once again for your valuable guidance. Regards, Nitish

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:22:50 -0000

Hello Nitish! I think that the RTU is not able to handle so many interrogations (1 per second is way too much). The link in I104 is somewhat abstracted as it is taken care by the TCP/IP stack. The reset process in I104 is an application level function and the reset link of I101 is link level, so they are different beasts. With the reset process command there is the option of general reset or just reset of events queue. There is also Test Command C_TS_TA_1 in I104 and it is also from application level....

Nitish posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nitish — Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:53:27 -0000

Sir, I have used qtester and another master to test an RTU with GI interval 1 second. It works fine. Then i tried to simulate multiple disconnections by setting a router disconnect of 10 mins. after running this setup for sometime (around 17 hrs), RTU stopped responding to any I format ASDUs and only responds to U format and sends confirmation S format ASDUs. Any I format ASDU gets ignored by the RTU till the RTU is reinitialized locally and the end of initialization command is sent by the salve....

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:53:36 -0000

Yes Nitish, your feedback is very important to me, please keep me updated with your results. DNP3 is also great for low bandwidth applications. It allows for interrogations by class, range of addresses, etc. I have also a DNP3 driver implemented as part of the OSHMI project. My Best Ricardo

Nitish posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nitish — Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:41:02 -0000

Sir, Thanks a lot! Your advice was extremely helpful. I can now simulate a fast GI interval using qtester on a low signal strength GSM/wifi network and check for link failures. Will provide an update when done. Regards Nitish

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:00:07 -0000

Hi Nitish! 1. Yes, it is possible to configure the time period for interrogations in the qtester104.ini file. [RTU1] ... ; period in seconds for general interrogations (default=330) GI_PERIOD=660 ... The time should never be less (nor aproximate) than the time it takes for the slave to send all the data points for the interrogation. So, if the interrogation takes 10s to complete you should program a time superior to 20s. This way you can leave some time for the slave to send exception data. In systems...

Nitish posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nitish — Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:04:01 -0000

Sir, 1. Is it possible to change the GI_period which is default= 330 seconds to any other value in Qtester? How should one decide the GI interval time period? 2. i have come across a few implementations of IEC 104 where the master sends GI commands every second. The Second interrogation Activation is being sent by the master even while the slave is still sending I frames in response to a previous GI command. Is it really required to have such a fast GI interval when background scan and spontaneous...

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.25.zip

QTester104 — Tue, 08 Jan 2019 17:21:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.24.zip

QTester104 — Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:39:02 -0000

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:28:02 -0000

Great! Yes Tobias, you can replace the executable in OSHMI, no problem. I should make this check of common addres as an option in the next OSHMI version. Regards.

Tobias Olsson posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Tobias Olsson — Wed, 17 Oct 2018 05:44:48 -0000

Thanks = ) now it´s working, and I can continue my tests. If I decide to use OSHMI, can I just replace the included version of Qtester with this one? Once again, thank you for quick respons, and keep up the very good work, /Best regards Tobias

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 23:46:40 -0000

Hi Tobias, This is something that can happen when there is different common addressess in the same connection. There is a check to avoid this situation that is undesirable in some situations. Please try the version 1.23a I have uploaded that does not perform this check. My Best, Ricardo

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.23a.zip

QTester104 — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 23:39:02 -0000

Tobias Olsson posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Tobias Olsson — Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:20:57 -0000

Hello I'm doing some test against a Sicam AK3 system, just trying to read out some singlepoint values. When I Use FreyerIEC104ClientSimulator Software, I only input the IP-adress and make connect, the system responds as expected, but when I use Qtester with "the same settings", I get the answer from the AK3 system that looks like this: 07:28:37 ti okt 16 2018 - v1.23 Try to connect IP: 172.16.0.31 TCP CONNECT! T<-- 006: 68 04 07 00 00 00 STARTDTACT R--> 006: 68 04 0b 00 00 00 STARTDTCON R--> ASDU...

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.23.zip

QTester104 — Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:20:02 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.22.zip

QTester104 — Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:27:02 -0000

Oliver posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Oliver — Wed, 07 Jun 2017 11:44:49 -0000

Hi Ricardo, Sorry for the long time to give you a feedback. It's working properly now, thanks for your prompt and efficient support. Regards, Oliver

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Tue, 30 May 2017 09:33:12 -0000

Ok Beppe, please keeep me informed of the results. If you need any help feel free to ask for. Maybe you should file a bug report in the IEC Server project. Regards,

Giuseppe di Bartolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Giuseppe di Bartolo — Tue, 30 May 2017 07:15:48 -0000

Yes I tried different write and I agree with you in some cases values are divided by for in other cases there is a strange rounding but now I could test in a true RTU testing. I'll update you during my work if you have pleasure ! Thanks Ricardo for your help Ciao ! Beppe

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Mon, 29 May 2017 17:02:14 -0000

Great! See screenshot of working config. I still think there is some problem with float values in IEC Server. If I send value 500 it gets 125, if I send 999 it gets 994.993!

Giuseppe di Bartolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Giuseppe di Bartolo — Mon, 29 May 2017 16:27:28 -0000

YEAHHHHHHH !!! Found the mistake ! In the IEC Server I used the incorrect type now Using the command type ID I'm able to write value. Sorry if I trouble you but I'm starting now to discover this world Thanks thanks thanks for your support Nice day Beppe

Giuseppe di Bartolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Giuseppe di Bartolo — Mon, 29 May 2017 16:05:25 -0000

Dear Ricardo no nothing. I follow your suggestion inserting zero (0) in the Local Link Address but now I receive the log "command rejected by the IEC104 Slave" was frustrating :( Do you have 5 minutes for me for a teamviewer connection so I oculd show the issue ? no problem if you are not available Thanks in advanced Beppe

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Mon, 29 May 2017 15:08:46 -0000

Dear Beppe Ahhh I've found the problem: IEC Server expects the link address from master to be 0 (zero). So just put 0 in the Local Link Address of QTester104, then things will start working. I think also there is some problem with precision of float values in IEC Server as it is not returning exact values it receives for float commands type 50. Hope you can make it work now! Regards

Giuseppe di Bartolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Giuseppe di Bartolo — Mon, 29 May 2017 10:09:09 -0000

Hi Ricardo, thanks for your reply. Was a very pleasure. I asking to dowload the suggested Enilit simulator. In the meanwhile I try your suggestion so using the IEC-TestServer (https://sourceforge.net/projects/iecserver/) cleaning some configuration (the previous log was not correct ... sorry) now I receive this messages. Command Address : 9 Command value: 150 ASDU Addr: Command Type: 50 - C_SE_NC_1 Without SBO: 12:07:55 T<-- FLOAT COMMAND ADDRESS 9 VAL 150 CA 1 SE 0 R--> 020: 68 12 12 00...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Sun, 28 May 2017 20:16:06 -0000

Dear Beppe, Thanks for your comments about QTester104. Please be sure to use the latest (1.21) version of QTester104. The slave (IEC Server) maybe is not expecting the command with select-before-operate ("SE 1" in the log of command sent and "SE" 0 in response) , please try to send the command without the SBO box checked in QTester104. I've simulated QTester104 with Enilit CMS as a slave (you can request a demo of it at http://www.enilit.lt ). It worked perfeclty, note that the value sent 150 is...

Giuseppe di Bartolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Giuseppe di Bartolo — Sun, 28 May 2017 19:18:51 -0000

Hi Ricardo, I found very very useful your QTester application to check RTU system. Now I tried to send command using your application without success. In particular I nedd to send float value to IOA object so I use the command type 50 (C_SE_NC_1) providing following parameter: Command Address : 9 Command value: 150 ASDU Addr: and when I confirm with the "Send Command" button in the IEC Server the IOA object (nr. 9) dorsn't receive the passed value (150). In the log I recevive following lines:...

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.21.zip

QTester104 — Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:33:04 -0000

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:31:09 -0000

Dear Oliver, The version 1.20 was uploaded with the correction of the month problem...

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.20.zip

QTester104 — Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:25:04 -0000

Oliver Gillam posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Oliver Gillam — Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:44:18 -0000

Hi Ricardo, Thanks for the feedback. Could you please notify me on my email address...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:36:06 -0000

Dear Oliver, You are right. I see that there is a problem in the code (iec104_class.cpp,...

Oliver Gillam posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Oliver Gillam — Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:41:26 -0000

Dear Ricardo I'm experiencing a problem with command type 59 (Double with time tag)...

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.19.zip

QTester104 — Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:12:04 -0000

Nguyen Khanh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nguyen Khanh — Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:59:35 -0000

GREAT ! Thank you very much ! Ricardolo. I must test now, i can not wait anymore...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:28:12 -0000

QTester was updated to version 1.18.

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.18.zip

QTester104 — Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:26:02 -0000

Nguyen Khanh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nguyen Khanh — Thu, 09 Feb 2017 04:30:04 -0000

Dear Ricardo. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Nguyen Khanh

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:45:15 -0000

Dear Nguyen, See here: http://www.mayor.de/lian98/doc.en/html/u_iec104_struct.htm...

Nguyen Khanh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nguyen Khanh — Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:55:54 -0000

Dear Ricardolo. I have something not clear, sorry but would you like help me ? What...

Nguyen Khanh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nguyen Khanh — Tue, 17 Jan 2017 04:28:49 -0000

Thanks Ricardolo.

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:09:47 -0000

Dear Nguyen Keep in mind that OA is1byte and CA is 2 bytes both fixed not optional....

Nguyen Khanh posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Nguyen Khanh — Mon, 16 Jan 2017 04:29:01 -0000

Dear ricardolo I have a problem with the link Adress. I can not type in the link...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Sun, 18 Dec 2016 01:04:04 -0000

Dear Irfan, It is always a pleasure to help. Regards

irfan posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

irfan — Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:52:19 -0000

thaks for your info. this is very helpfull to me and thanks for all ricardo :D

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:48:51 -0000

Hi Irfan. No, this is currently not possible. What is possible is to define a backup...

irfan modified a comment on discussion General Discussion

irfan — Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:21:28 -0000

hi ricardo, i got new problem. can you help me again? how to connect in multiple...

irfan posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

irfan — Tue, 06 Dec 2016 02:20:50 -0000

hi ricardo, i got new problem. can you help me to connect different ip in same time...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:14:19 -0000

I intend to write some documentation about the protocol structure, etc., but it'll...

Miguel Angel Bravo Migone posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

Miguel Angel Bravo Migone — Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:13:08 -0000

It wold be nice if we have some examples in command sending. This is for the lack...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:18:23 -0000

Hope it can help you accomplish your work Irfan. Regards

irfan posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

irfan — Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:19:32 -0000

thanks ricardo. you qTester104 very helpful to me

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.17.zip

QTester104 — Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:15:20 -0000

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.17.zip

QTester104 — Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:09:12 -0000

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:08:59 -0000

Ok Irfan, try version 1.17.

irfan posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

irfan — Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:03:03 -0000

thaks ricardo, for the update. yes, i need that ASDU Address for controlling multiple...

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:36:40 -0000

You can now send C_CS_NA_1 Clock sync command in version 1.16.

QTester104 released /qtester104-v1.16.zip

QTester104 — Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:35:03 -0000

ricardolo posted a comment on discussion General Discussion

ricardolo — Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:50:56 -0000

Hi Irfan, The C_CS_NA_1 Clock sync command it's easy to implement, I'll add it as...