<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to patches</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/</id><updated>2016-08-02T21:42:32.720000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to patches</subtitle><entry><title>Building Strigi-0.7.8 with mingw-w64 fails</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/5/" rel="alternate"/><published>2016-08-02T21:42:32.720000Z</published><updated>2016-08-02T21:42:32.720000Z</updated><author><name>Mateusz Mikuła</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/mati865/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net8f16e6c20c1b76d41e9d2320c1cf8017915d61c0</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Without dlfcn: &lt;a href="http://pastebin.com/AKvqnjr4" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://pastebin.com/AKvqnjr4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
With dlfcn: &lt;a href="http://pastebin.com/8vJYDUBp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://pastebin.com/8vJYDUBp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are many missing or conflicting declarations, e.g.:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```&lt;br/&gt;
D:/msys64/usr/include/sys/types.h:129:18: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef long int time_t'&lt;br/&gt;
 typedef &lt;em&gt;TIME_T&lt;/em&gt; time_t;&lt;br/&gt;
                  ^~~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;D:/msys64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/crtdefs.h:138:20: note: previous declaration as 'typedef &lt;strong&gt;time64_t time_t'&lt;br/&gt;
 typedef &lt;/strong&gt;time64_t time_t;&lt;br/&gt;
 ```&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>#4 Strigi-0.7.8 fails to configure when building with GCC-6</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/4/?limit=25#1e21" rel="alternate"/><published>2016-05-14T16:10:27.604000Z</published><updated>2016-05-14T16:10:27.604000Z</updated><author><name>Peter Levine</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/hodorgasm/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net14ded8c8902f942ebb74f6aa7460346a02668f1a</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patch to fix building with GCC-6&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Strigi-0.7.8 fails to configure when building with GCC-6</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/4/" rel="alternate"/><published>2016-05-14T16:08:09.965000Z</published><updated>2016-05-14T16:08:09.965000Z</updated><author><name>Peter Levine</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/hodorgasm/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net3aa315257446bb2ab3d46de7c464261fce3d9d11</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Building Strigi-0.7.8 fails with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="codehilite"&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;span class="x"&gt;CMake Error at libstreams/cmake/MacroEnsureVersion.cmake:27 (MATH):&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="x"&gt;  math cannot parse the expression: "x86_646*10000 + x86_641*100 + x86_640":&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="x"&gt;  syntax error, unexpected exp_NUMBER, expecting &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;$&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nv"&gt;end&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="x"&gt; (8)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;p&gt;and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="codehilite"&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&lt;span class="x"&gt;CMake Error at libstreamanalyzer/cmake/MacroEnsureVersion.cmake:27 (MATH):&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="x"&gt;  math cannot parse the expression: "x86_646*10000 + x86_641*100 + x86_640":&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="x"&gt;  syntax error, unexpected exp_NUMBER, expecting &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;$&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nv"&gt;end&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="x"&gt; (8)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Make search function in searchclient discoverable</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/3/" rel="alternate"/><published>2010-06-04T13:04:39Z</published><updated>2010-06-04T13:04:39Z</updated><author><name>Johannes Buchner</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/johannesbuchner/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.neta41b637be0ca2edcb5f5edcecd332faa88f2b1c8</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The search function (bottom field) in the searchclient is hard to discover, and that the interface switches to a different mode is neat, but unexpected. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch adds a label before the search input field. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Future improvements could separate the mainview widget more clearly from the searchbox. For example, by putting a horizontal line in, and by moving the search field to the top.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title> use sys/inotify.h</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/2/" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-09-24T06:27:16Z</published><updated>2008-09-24T06:27:16Z</updated><author><name>Adrian Bunk</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/bunk/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netd8c5f0fb5d7b6af8db2d03e08e098063a61d2c41</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some time ago glibc did not yet have inotify support, which forced several applications (including strigi) to ship their own copy of the required headers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Especially considering that this also requires updating the syscall numbers each time a new architecture wants to get supported it's the best to instead switch to #include &amp;lt;sys/inotify.h&amp;gt; now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;src/daemon/events/inotifytest.cpp was already using sys/inotify.h&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>patch for xapian compilation</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/strigi/patches/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-03-15T13:16:27Z</published><updated>2008-03-15T13:16:27Z</updated><author><name>Egon Willighagen</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/egonw/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net569a83949caf0b773ca32571d86c01f6a67c3da5</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the strigi-devel mailing list:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am including a patch for getting xapian  included as optional&lt;br /&gt;
backend in cmake.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The patch is quite comprehensive, so I thought, I should apply for&lt;br /&gt;
repository access. But that has not come through, so sending patch to&lt;br /&gt;
the forum.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would also want to work on getting xapian backend working seemlessly&lt;br /&gt;
with strigi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br /&gt;
Supreet Sethi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>