<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to bugs</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/swtbot/bugs/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/swtbot/bugs/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/swtbot/bugs/</id><updated>2008-09-18T14:06:07Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to bugs</subtitle><entry><title>The bundled commons-collections  have problem</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/swtbot/bugs/3/" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-09-18T14:06:07Z</published><updated>2008-09-18T14:06:07Z</updated><author><name>Tinh Truong</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/tinh911/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netdc7bf870b8ce1a23e3d008f01b92d111d8a88b17</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the moment, when I run a test case with SWTBot, I've encountered a SecurityException about the signing information. I replaced the commons-collections bundled with SWTBot 1.2.0 with the one from Apache (version 3.2.1), everything run fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Externalize initialization of DefaultChildrenResolver</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/swtbot/bugs/2/" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-02-09T06:10:29Z</published><updated>2007-02-09T06:10:29Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net30a05218683021d8daff66dcbf94be2230f72dc5</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;DefaultChildrenResolver is initialized via a constructor. It would be nice if it could be initialized via a properties file.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Better alternative to resolving children</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/swtbot/bugs/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-02-08T11:35:04Z</published><updated>2007-02-08T11:35:04Z</updated><author><name>Ketan Padegaonkar</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/kpadegaonkar/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netf423ea06487c4b4f067d85e74e834ffd2f02b520</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;String widgetClassName = someWidget.getClass().getName();&lt;br /&gt;
Resolver resolver = ResolverPool.resolverFor(someWidget);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ResolverPool.resolverFor(Object someObject){&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;String className = someObject.getClass().getName();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if(className == Object/Widget/Item)&lt;br /&gt;
return new DefaultResolverThatPrintsAnErrorMessageAndObjectHierarchy();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Resolver resolver = resolverMap.get(className);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if(resolver == null)&lt;br /&gt;
return resolverFor(someObject.getClass().getParent());&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you stick to the lowest level class first, then you'd hit the&lt;br /&gt;
TabFolderResolver rather than the CompositeResolver.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>