From: Patrick F. <pfi...@oz...> - 2007-02-19 21:47:08
>I think John O's critical stance of OO (that rubbed the Java guys the wrong
>way) and Tcl's lack of object oriented features was one of the biggest
> reasons something did not happen.
Very interesting. What exactly did John O have against OO?
From: Bruce J. <nm...@ma...> - 2007-02-19 21:53:43
http://home.pacbell.net/ouster/scripting.html
On Feb 19, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>
>
>> I think John O's critical stance of OO (that rubbed the Java guys
>> the wrong
>> way) and Tcl's lack of object oriented features was one of the
>> biggest
>> reasons something did not happen.
>
> Very interesting. What exactly did John O have against OO?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> tcljava-dev mailing list
> tcl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcljava-dev