|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2012-03-23 15:59:12
|
On 03/23/2012 07:37 AM, Zenny wrote: > >> We also >> heavily depends on the contributions from our users. If you want to >> know any more details on DL specific features, you'll have to do the >> leg-work yourself and google around. > > Nope, the burden of proof lies to the developers. ... I'd say that DL's targeted audience is professional admins, which know what they want and why. DL has several major features - stability, security enhancements and distribution specific like "run-from-ram", configuration is separated from the system image, simplicity of customization of course (I use DL as a Cisco ASA replacement actually, much more flexible and powerful replacement). Nobody knows what exactly do you need, besides you of course. DL may be suitable for your needs, may be not. Do not rely on our proofs, get your own. It's a tool which can help in your job, may harm > >> There's nothing magic we're doing >> in DL. Everything we do and use is publicly available. >> IF you decide to do all this research into all the various security >> details, how about putting everything into a nice presentation so that >> we can put it on our website? > > I already stopped exploring because it was like groping in the dark. > Best of luck to your project, but I bid adieu to DL as well as this > mailing list! If you cannot independently "dissect" a linux distribution, most probably DL is not for you. LFS-based distributions are not oriented for newbies, unfortunately. Your right to choose what to use and what not to use. Good luck, Serge |