|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2015-11-26 16:04:24
|
Thanks for testing, that's very helpful!
> 1) ssh server
> I needed to generate this key with ssh-keygen -A
Is this something we want to execute automatically if
/etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key is missing?
> 5) fdisk
> There are 15 of these, I am not used to see that...
That's weird. I'm not seeing those on my system.
Are there any other error or warning messages in the syslog or during boot?
> 6) LVM
That's working fine on my servers. Not sure what's going on. Any error
or warning messages?
> 7) iptables
I started looking into this. Frank pointed that one out also. There's
something wrong with the module loading and dependency tracking. Not yet
sure what's going on. I started a new compile with the 4.2 kernel and the
latest kmod. Maybe it's a bug that's fixed now.
Heiko
Quoting Ma poubelle <the...@gm...>:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, thanks for the great job!
>
> I did some tests and here my results:
>
> 1) ssh server
> I got in the logs:
> Nov 25 12:26:39 Devil sshd[1552]: error: Could not load host key:
> /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key
>
> I needed to generate this key with ssh-keygen -A
>
> 2) radius-client (with PAM)
> OK
>
> 3) apache
> Very basic site OK
>
> 4) mysql
> I just logged in and out OK
>
> 5) fdisk
> root@Devil:/etc/init.d# fdisk -l
> Disk /dev/ram15: 16 MiB, 16777216 bytes, 32768 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>
> There are 15 of these, I am not used to see that...
>
> 6) LVM
> Seems ok, but it is not mounted after a reboot.
> I did test with /var/data
>
> 7) iptables
> root@Devil:/etc/init.d# iptables -L
> iptables v1.4.21: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Table
> does not exist (do you need to insmod?)
> Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.
>
> Do you know what to do?
>
> 8) heartbeat ?
> This package has been removed?
> What is the replacement one?
>
>
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> 2015-11-21 20:53 GMT+01:00 <udo...@al...>:
>
>> Hi Heiko,
>> I don't prefer an symlink, because the output is different - if someone
>> use netstat inside an script, the different output will perhaps "kill"
>> the script.
>> Not the clean way...
>>
>> What's about an simple message?
>> cat /bin/netstat
>> #!/bin/bash
>> echo "no netstat anymore - please use ss instead"
>>
>> Udo
>>
>> Am 2015-11-21 14:20, schrieb Heiko Zuerker:
>>> Udo,
>>>
>>> Should we create a symlink? Not creating one would force us all
>>> getting used to the new commands.
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> Quoting udo...@al...:
>>>
>>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>> instead of netstat "ss" do the job...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Udo
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
--
Regards
Heiko Zuerker
|