Re: [FE-discuss] patch for StringBoolean

On 10/5/05, Ian Bicking <ia...@co...> wrote:
> Both these are applied now, plus there is a validate_python setting
> which, if set to False, will let otherwise Invalid-seeming values get
> through (which is usually what I find I want, since I can't give errors
> to the client about data they don't yet have access to).

Sounds like a good addition, and I agree that it makes sense as a
default. Generally, the Python side will know what it's doing...

Kevin